D. Caroline Coile, Ph.D.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Books
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • Baha Salukis
  • Surveys

Oompa-loompas and Toto too? Or, How They Cook Dog Food in Kansas

3/16/2012

14 Comments

 
Picture
It wasn't exactly a golden ticket to the chocolate
factory---but to a dog writer who writes about dog nutrition, a trip to tour Hill's research lab and manufacturing plant was the next best thing. 
So I donned my ruby slippers and set off in a whirlwind (get it? huh? get it? Yeah, I hate when people say that) to Kansas!


I'm going to skip the part about research and development and cats and dogs and kittens and puppies ---we'll come back to them in a later post---and get to the part that really fascinated me: making the stuff.  Because I've seen research and cats and dogs and kittens and puppies, but I've never seen dog food made. Actually, if you know my cooking skills, you are probably shouting, "And you've never seen human food made, either!" which I think is really pretty mean of you, and wrong, too. I have many times watched the sandwich artists at Subway make human food. Artists. But I digress.


By the time of the tour, we'd already discussed the
ingredient list, and how the ingredient vendors are chosen on the basis of various tests and quality controls and ingredient requirements; how dog food manufacturers must meet all sorts of regulations and pass all sorts of inspections; and how chicken is the same as chicken meal before said chicken has all the water sucked out of him but chicken, not chicken meal, looks better in the ingredient list.  So Hill's brings their chickens in pre-dehydration; I was pretty sure the chickens had already passed on to a better place before embarking on their trip, but just in case, I wondered if they would be subjecting them to little sweat boxes. 
 

Just to be clear, I am not one who enjoys knowing what goes into my own food. If it looks anatomical, I don't eat it. I prefer the illusion that all my food grows on trees or in microwaves. So in anticipation of trucks dumping loads of chicken heads or sheep guts into immense boiling vats, I ate a light breakfast of fruit. Can't go wrong with fruit. Well, except for the part where I was starving, but...

At the plant---which looked suspiciously like Emerald
City in the distance---I donned rubber steel-toed shoe covers, hair net, safety goggles, hard hat, and lab coat. More visions of sloshing through animal entrails while dodging errant body parts danced through my head. But I was tough, I could do this. We made our way to the unloading area. I prepared for flies and slop and mayhem; what I found was...


One truck, inside an enclosed bay, with one employee and one truck driver, both hair netted as they watch the truck dispense rice into a bay, from which the rice was sucked up into a storage area. This wasn't the truck's first stop; it's load had to pass an inspection
station located well away from the building. It had to drive inside the unloading bay and have the outer building doors closed before it could start unloading. Computers regulated where the materials went; all ingredients, I learned, were bar coded and their containers were also bar coded so that only certain ingredients could be placed in or removed from the appropriate bins. Without the correct match, the bins refuse to open, so there's no chance of an ingredient mix-up. The ingredients aren't stored in silos, as I'd expected, but instead stored inside to protect them from moisture and other environmental factors.


OK, so the unloading area was a letdown. No flies, no
gnats, not a friggin' bollweevil. No blood, no guts, no smell. But there was still the processing part.  This is
where I would surely see the vats of animal parts, heads bobbing, stirred into a porridge by workers who kept losing shoes, dentures and excess body parts in
them.


But first, we had to pass through an air lock. And walk
through a shoe sterilizer. And wash our hands. Wait---an air lock? Turns out the building is really three buildings; they separate the building where raw materials exist from the building where the materials are mixed and sterilized and processed from the building where they are bagged and shipped. And from building to building there's an airlock, with the air always flowing from the more sterile building to the less sterile building (you can feel it when you go through the door). Nothing--- food, tools, trolleys, nothing---goes from less sterile to more sterile unless it's been sterilized. They even maintain separate maintenance rooms and tools for each building; whoever thought of a hammer as a potential pathogen vector, the dreaded Typhoid Toolbelt of the hardware world? Who knew?

But back to the vats of stewing parts. 
 
Um...there weren't any. The ingredients were mixed in a separate place, with computers and machines doing the work, not workers or oompa-loompas. No vats. No measuring cups. No singing. No people! After being
heated to, um, I forgot the actual temperature but let's just call it "hellfire hot" and pushed into a tiny passageway at, um, I forgot the actual psi but let's just call it "squashed" the pathogens are all, um, let's call it "really dead." Then the food is extruded, dried and enrobed (my favorite new term, fancy for "covered in flavorants" as in "She was enrobed in chocolate.") All untouched by human hands. Or oompa-loompa hands, watch hands, or (probably) even the hands of God. I had a feeling I wasn't in Kansas any more...except, you know, for the part where I was...

 Finally, a worker emerged! I'd started to suspect this
was all a vast front and no actual people or dog food were actually involved. He let some of the food escape and took a batch for testing--fresh and hot from the extruder! The nuggets were tested for size, moisture content, this, that--I forgot, so let's just call it "a bunch of stuff," and it was taken to a lab where all sorts of computer screens were reading out all sorts of stuff---this did not look like any kitchen I'd ever seen. Testing occurs at various levels of production every half hour. In other words, it pretty much never stops anywhere on the line.


So, now the food is dried---not too much, not too little.
If it's too much, the texture is bad. If it's too little, it could encourage mold growth in the bag. So it's tested again. It's whisked to the next building, where it's automatically dispensed into bags. The bags then go through a metal detector to make sure no foreign metal parts have somehow made it through and into a bag---if that were to happen, other instruments could be used to isolate the single kibble that may contain it so the source could be traced. And regardless, random bags are opened and the food tested yet again. 
 

Okay, so all my preconceived notions about dog food
packing were, um, let's just call them "wrong." The dog food plant makes my kitchen look unsanitary by comparison, and if you know me, you know I have a  clean thing going on when it comes to food.


But we weren't finished. The bags then went to the
warehouse, where they spend an average of five days. Finally, the oompa-loompas! There were people with forklifts and more people and more forklifts and food going here and up and right and left and the building was about the size of Cobo Hall, and certainly larger than where they had the AKC Invitational this year (the whole place is 585,000 square feet). But still, no singing. I really think there should be singing.


Finally, my tour was over and I was treated to lunch that had been brought in from a local eatery. I somewhat reluctantly ate it, my mind going longingly to the bags of dog food I'd just seen---because I had no idea where the food on my plate had come from, but I KNEW the food in those bags was clean!


14 Comments
Tammy
3/16/2012 11:07:13 am

I am impressed with this company. I had no idea that they use 3 seperate buildings to make dog and cat food. I was impressed to learn that they check quality every 30 minutes!

After being in your home and seeing your kitchen I can imagine your face when handed food from an off site place.

I appreciate the description of the facility.

Reply
CC
3/16/2012 11:36:12 am

I DID eat food you cooked, Tammy!

Reply
CC
3/16/2012 11:30:52 pm

Oh, and Tammy, I forgot to mention the most important thing: The President and CEO has six (I believe) Cocker Spaniels, and at least the three in the picture with him were ASCOBs!

Reply
Tammy
3/18/2012 03:00:28 am

Wow! Well I need to visit!

Brett Deutsch link
3/16/2012 11:09:51 am

Wow! With all the contamination scares there have been with dog food in the last couple of years, this is REALLY reassuring. Love your posts. They always put that special "twist" on things :).

Reply
cc
3/16/2012 11:52:04 am

I gotta say, I have been torn with the fears on one side about possible contamination in commercial foods, and on the other, possible problems in raw foods. I cannot imagine preparing foods at home that would approach the degree of sanitation I witnessed. Of course, when preparing a packaged or canned food you DO need to be more careful than when going outside and chopping a chicken's head off in your own backyard. Both with the germs and the fingers. Or wait, I think I got that backwards. At least with the fingers, But anyway, I am curious how it compares to other facilities. They did say that they favored sharing technology with other dog food companies when it came to safety, not only for the good of dogs, but for the industry, because as the saying goes, "A rising tide raises all ships." I liked that.

Reply
Valerie Kaeppler
3/16/2012 11:31:16 am

Great write up Caroline! Thanks for this info along w/ your humor.

Reply
kim fountain
3/16/2012 10:08:54 pm

The fastidiousness of the facility is great. ...what about contaminants in the raw materials? i am interested in the sourcing ofthe ingredients ... didn't the problems a few years ago have to do with a product added in China to "up" the protein readings? I don't know if Hills was involved, but d
id they talk about situations like that, and has purchase of ingredients been made "safer" since then, and how can they weed out stuff like that?

Reply
CC
3/16/2012 11:28:14 pm

Kim, that was my question as well. I am going to try to answer from memory, but if need be I will do actual work and look up my notes. I recorded the sessions with my sound note app. Anyway---I asked specifically about China and melamine. They have a separtment whose job is ingredient and product safety---they inspect all incoming ingredients, with a different checklist depending on ingredient. But before that they inspect the plants that make them. The safety VP did say that the melamine caught everyone in the industry by surprise---nobody had suspected that a foreign material would be added to a product just to increase profits by falsely inflating protein readings, and that that additive would react in such a deadly way when ingested. Now they test for it; then they had no reason to. At this time they (Hill's) uses only one ingredient that is sourced from China: taurine. Could another heretofore unknown additive again be placed in source ingredients? Yes, because you can't test for things you don't suspect. So you have to go with reputable sources and keep up to date. Also mentioned were the huge number of outside inspections done on their facility--granted, this is after the ingredients have arrived--but they mentioned that the FDA said their facility was cleaner than many human food ones; the FDA is concerned not so much with dog health as it is with baby health, because babies tend to put dog food and treats in their mouths.

Reply
CC
3/17/2012 12:56:24 am

OK, now you owe me--I (gasp) looked up the answers. I will paraphrase: the ingredients are subject to microbiological, senory, chemical and foreign matter testing. The facilities the ingredients come from have to meet stringent standards--and for suppliers with multiple sites, each site must meet the same standards. Raw materials are sourced only from vendors with reliable safety procedures; they are mostly from the U.S., Japan, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and several European countries. All meat is from the US, except for lamb, which is from New Zealand. Neat and poultry are from government inspected facilities. Incoming materials must meet documented quality standards and specifications. Examples: Corn is tested for moisture, protein, fat, ash and mycotoxins; pork liver for moisture, protein, fat, ash; fish oil for moisture, peroxide value, free fatty acids.

Reply
kim
3/17/2012 05:17:07 am

wow, you should have said you remembered all that! thank you. if i was unhappy with my current method of feeding, i would choose Hills!

Rod
3/18/2012 10:24:33 am

Reminds me of the advertising brag: "Untouched by human hands!", showing a chimpanzee stirring the pot. But I digress...

Kibble, in short, is inappropriate for canine consumption, regardless of how sterilized it may be. Hills, famous for buying the loyalty of veterinarians all over this country, is all about buying product placement. There is even a display of Hills products in the waiting room of the University of Florida's veterinary clinic.

Reply
Jay
9/8/2012 08:50:09 am

Why do you say that, Rod? What makes you think "Kibble, in short, is inappropriate for canine consumption"? If you're relying on statistically significant, scientific evidence, then you couldn't be more wrong. The principles of nutritional science and animal physiology also tell us there is no merit to your comment. Please stop spreading misinformation about dog/cat food. When you make comments, use facts and not propaganda. Be critical of the things you hear, rather then be led by baseless conjecture. Look for expert opinions, from people with education in the specific areas you're researching and be caseful of those whit a personal agenda. I'm an animal nutritionist (meaning I have 2 nutritiondegrees and many years of industry experience) and I can tell you, kibble can certainly be (and seeing the proof all around me in the many dogs and cats that thrive on the stuff) appropriate for dogs and cats.

Reply
pet friendly accommodation link
7/12/2012 09:49:06 pm

I thing it is very good business line for business owners who want to make something good for pets.
























Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Caroline Coile

    Dog writer, science geek, Saluki savant and communicator of all things dog. I'm concerned about hereditary health problems,  the decline of purebred dogs and the changing climate of dog ownership. I compete with my Salukis in conformation, agility, lure coursing and obedience. I write about science, breeds, health and competitions---and I don't believe in blindly folllowing the accepted dogma of the dog world.

    Archives

    January 2017
    October 2016
    August 2013
    June 2013
    December 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011

    Categories

    All
    Breeds
    My Life
    My World
    Science
    Shows
    Writing

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.